Have you ever attempted to calm down an emotional person? Our natural inclination is to deny the emotional content of what the speaker is saying by using logic and/or facts such as, “There is no reason to get upset”, “Calm down”, “You are over-reacting”, “You have misunderstood”, “Maybe it is because”¦.”; “Don’t be so sensitive”, “Let’s look at the facts”¦”, “If you really think about it”¦.”, et cetera. (Micro-Interventions in Mediation, by Douglas E. Noll at pp. 15-23 (2014))
In reality, what we are doing is making the situation worse. We are, in essence, invalidating and denying the emotional content of the statements and the feelings of the speaker; and the more we invalidate, the more emotional the speaker will become. (Our natural inclination is to become more stubborn or obstinate in the face of adversity or a “NO!”) (Id.)
I learned this “simple” lesson at a recent training session with Douglas E. Noll who explains that the best way to deal with emotional people is by using “Micro-Interventions”. He urges that rather than listening to the words of the speaker, to listen to the emotional content and simply respond to the statement by labeling the emotion. For example,
Speaker: It would stink to have to lose my house, but no way do I want to have to pay for it while she’s living in it with her boyfriend.
Response: You are angry, frustrated, and sad. You feel betrayed and disrespected. You feel grief and abandonment.
Speaker: It would be so hard to settle with all of my debt hanging over me.
Response: You are anxious and fearful. You are confused and uncertain. You feel alone and unsupported. You feel abandoned.
(Micro-Interventions in Mediation, by Douglas E. Noll at p. 23 (2014))
More often than not, the primary emotion being expressed is anger. This may often be followed by frustration, anxiety, fear and disgust, sadness and grief and finally, abandonment. (Id.)
Initially, it will feel quite awkward, if not uncomfortable, to respond by labeling the emotion and sometimes, you will label the emotion incorrectly (Mr. Noll cautions not to use “I” statements but rather always start with “you.’) But, as Mr. Noll, points out, identifying the wrong emotion is quite alright as the speaker will be quick to correct you by saying what she is really feeling. When you respond back with that emotion (and perhaps one or two others), you will know that you have correctly assessed the situation when the speaker responds with an unconscious head nod, or a “yes” , and a slight lowering or bowing of the shoulders indicating relief/release. When this happens, the speaker will suddenly feel as if you have “really” heard what she has been saying and understand her and will calm down. (Id. at 31.)
At this point, you can discuss the issue on a more “rational” or “factual” basis, looking for options and ways to resolve the issue.
According to Mr. Noll, this micro-intervention should take no more than 90 seconds and can be very subtle. But, it will get the speaker to calm down, and become “rational” once again.
Since returning from the training, I have tried it a few times and “¦it works! So, give it a try”¦ you will be surprised at the results!
“¦.. Just something to think about.
865 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1388
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Latest posts by Phyllis Pollack (see all)
- The NFL’s Moral Disengagement - February 1, 2019
- New Mediation Confidentiality Law - September 12, 2018
- Sunk Costs and the California Law Revision CommissionBy: Phyllis G. Pollack, Esq., PGP Mediation - October 2, 2017